No Fault Divorce. Are We Nearly There?

DISCLOSURE: This blog contains affiliate links, which we may receive a commission for purchases. The decision is yours, whether or not you decide to buy.

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill 2019-21 has been presented to parliament three times now, having been reintroduced, after some delay due to prorogation of Parliament in September 2019 and the General Election which followed in December 2019.

It has passed through the House of Lords and passed its second reading in the House of Commons, with an overwhelming majority of 231 for votes to 16 against.

It was committed to the House of Commons for the remaining stages on 17th June 2020, with the final stage of Royal Assent being now firmly in sight.

This all means that we are nearly there. No fault divorce is on its way to becoming law.

It’s been a long slog to say the least, having first been introduced by the Family Law Act 1996, but the provisions then were deemed unworkable and it was later repealed.

What is the law in England & Wales Under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, there is only one ground for divorce in England and Wales and that is the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. In turn, the petitioner must establish one of five ‘facts’:

  • Adultery
  • unreasonable behaviour
  • desertion
  • two years' separation with the consent of the respondent
  • five years' separation (no consent required)

What are the issues with the law?

The issues with the law as it currently stands is that 3/5 of the ‘facts’ attribute blame to the respondent – the respondent’s committed adultery, the respondent behaved unreasonably and the respondent deserted the petitioner.

This often creates an adversarial and accusatorial process which makes an already difficult divorce even harder.

In addition, there may be situations where there has been no adultery, there has been no unreasonable behaviour and the petitioner has not been deserted.

However, the parties do not want to wait two years or even five years before they divorce and so the petitioner has no choice but to invent or exaggerate examples of unreasonable behaviour just to get the divorce through.

As you can imagine, this does not go down well with the respondent who has essentially done nothing wrong.


For the above and many other reasons, including the case of Owens v Owens, pressure to reform our divorce law grew, until it was finally placed on the government’s agenda.

The basis of the reform was “to make divorce law consistent with the non-confrontational approach taken in wider family law and to recognise that a legal process that does not introduce or aggravate conflict will better support adults to take responsibility for their own futures and, most importantly, for their children’s futures’’.

This resulted in The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill 2017-19 being introduced in the House of Common in June 2019. However, as a result of the prorogation of parliament last year, the Bill was re-introduced in the House of Lords in January 2020 as The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill 2019-21 (Bill). It has thankfully now passed its Third Reading in the House of Commons.

What will change and what are the benefits?

The Bill reforms the legal requirements and process for divorce. It aims to remove conflict and make the divorce process less acrimonious.

Key measures will:

  • retain the sole ground of irretrievable breakdown but crucially, there will be no ‘facts’, meaning there will be no need to blame your spouse or live separately for 2 or 5 years to obtain a divorce. Instead, there will be a new requirement to provide a statement of irretrievable breakdown. No further evidence will be needed.
  • allow a spouse to assert that the marriage has broken down irretrievably without the other spouse challenging this and potentially blocking the divorce. Instead, the court will take the statement of irretrievable breakdown to be conclusive evidence that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.

Introduce a new option whereby spouses can make a joint application for a divorce. • Introduce a 6-month timeframe to the divorce process.  

When will it come into effect/apply?

All that remains now is for the Bill to receive Royal assent, which will be later this year.

This is when the Queen formally agrees to make the Bill into an Act of Parliament (law).

That said, it may take some time for the Bill to be implemented and thereafter, it may take some time for new forms and procedures to be drafted.  

The lord chancellor Robert Buckland told MPs that the Bill’s reforms will not come into force on Royal assent ‘‘because time needs to be allowed for careful implementation’’. Robert Buckland also said ‘‘At this early stage, we are working towards an indicative timetable of implementation in autumn 2021.’’

How might the Bill impact couples currently in lockdown who may be considering a divorce?

Whether you petition for a divorce now or whether you wait really depends on the individual circumstances of your case.

However, given that we are some way off in the legislation coming into force, it would seem that those who have already made the difficult decision may prefer to get on with it, if they can agree to do so as amicably as possible.

Waiting even longer can adversely affect both finances and children matters, though this may depend on your specific circumstances.

What happens if couples decide to divorce and then change their minds?

You can stop divorce proceedings any time up until the grant of the decree absolute. Once your final divorce decree has been granted, there is no going back.

Will this new quickie divorce have a cooling off period?

The Bill does not provide for a ‘quickie divorce’.

Instead, there is a minimum 6-month timeframe before the divorce can be finalised. Furthermore, it is standard practice for various reasons not to finalise a divorce until after financial matters have been resolved, which can take many months or even years.

If the legislation is passed, could it be open to abuse?

There are some concerns about the financial impact, such as the issues surrounding pensions, and often ignored and sometimes very valuable asset in a marriage.

If the final divorce is granted before a pension sharing order comes into effect, there is a chance that the order could fail. However, this is a real and present issue in any event and so legal advice is of course required.

Does the proposed Bill go far enough? Or are there other areas you’d have liked to have seen it tackle?

Arguably, the ability to halt the process to allow finances to be dealt with before a final decree would be helpful.

There are many issues surrounding the rights of married couples, which fall away on divorce, and so if one party passes away in the process and the divorce has been finalised, this may leave them financially vulnerable.

Though, either party can issue a financial application in order to preserve their position here if necessary.

All in all, it is the BLM team’s view that this reform could not come soon enough and will have an overall positive impact on the situation for divorcing couples.

This article was wriiten by Yasmin Khan-Gunns | @londonfamilysolicitor Family Solicitor BLM, London 

Like to write an article? Email

Disclaimer: This document does not present a complete or comprehensive statement of the law, nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight issues that may be of interest. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in any particular case.



GET MY FREE DOWNLOAD 30 ways to thrive
through divorce